Can you provide some details on how they are visually different in a way you don't expect? I don't see anything unexpected in what I'm seeing in your screenshot.
Chad, 1t Renko is not supposed to have wicks going above or below previous candle body. Compare how NQ looks vs 6E on a screenshot that I provided. 6E shows wicks whereas NQ (and ES, CL, etc for that matter) does not.
It appears the display format of 99.9999 (tick increment of 0.0001) is no longer accurate for 6E/EU and that it now ticks in 0.00005 (20,000ths). Is that a recent change you are aware of? Anyway, just click in chart and choose "Setup: Instrument" and change display format to 20,000ths as seen below, then close and reopen chart and see if that fixes.
For some reason I cannot attach more then 1 file to the message.
Can you provide some details on how they are visually different in a way you don't expect? I don't see anything unexpected in what I'm seeing in your screenshot.
Chad, 1t Renko is not supposed to have wicks going above or below previous candle body. Compare how NQ looks vs 6E on a screenshot that I provided. 6E shows wicks whereas NQ (and ES, CL, etc for that matter) does not.
It appears the display format of 99.9999 (tick increment of 0.0001) is no longer accurate for 6E/EU and that it now ticks in 0.00005 (20,000ths). Is that a recent change you are aware of? Anyway, just click in chart and choose "Setup: Instrument" and change display format to 20,000ths as seen below, then close and reopen chart and see if that fixes.
http://www.cmegroup.com/tools-information/lookups/advisories/ser/SER-742...
I checked format for the 6E contract and it is already set to 20,000ths. Something else is causing this issue.
I'm looking into this and will get to bottom of it before next release goes out. There does seem to be an issue with the 1t Renko charts of 6E/EU.